InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 1829
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/11/2004

Re: cl001 post# 63548

Sunday, 01/28/2007 12:27:27 PM

Sunday, January 28, 2007 12:27:27 PM

Post# of 173758
cl001:LIM

ahhh the best laid plans. I'd say the potential strike is already built into the price. Some risk (small) of significant downside (5-10%)if they suddenly manage to come to terms (I am thinking it is almost 80% certain they will strike) or maybe a little less downside if they agree to keep working at the negotiations.

I am thinking about sellling a significant amount prior to Feb 1. I may reinvest in another nickel stock (maybe one of the junior near term producers) or one of the near term zinc producers like ADA, if it gets back to 1.10-1.15 range at the time. It has good volume and lots of volatility with an upward trend.

Zinc should have one more run in it at least so there is more potential upside from where zinc stocks are trading now (a little beaten down) to where they can go.

Doing less buy and hold and more swing trading of metals as we move through 2007. I think this is a safer and maybe more profitable way to go than just holding.

Just my thoughts. Have fun!

JFF7.

It's better to be out wishing you were in than in wishing you were out.

"Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent". - John Maynard Keynes

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.