""""""""""Is that something like wanting to be the first to know and tell? I wonder how the attorney or Mr. Fritz would know his phone number, if he wasn't the one constantly calling and complaining and wanting to know information, no other stockholder was aware of.
Is this insider information, or a company's constant struggle to ward problems, and only this named "problem has a right to discuss on this board, their heresay problems and their contacts with NEOM"."""""""""
There you go making statements about something you know nothing about again, and making false claims about me.
NOPE I didnt call wanting to know information no other shareholder was aware of. Matter of fact I emailed my number WITH INFORMATION that was posted on this board.
For your information and everyone else here, that wants to speculate on the how and whys I will make it quite clear. Unlike so many here that constantly harass management, sorry to disappoint you but I am not one of them. All those posts here about crap that has nothing to do with NEOM, and the remarks to kick it up to them are just examples.
I on the other hand contacted the company 1(THATS ONE) time in the last year and a half, unlike your allegation. I did so with very good cause as a shareholder, of what I perceived and had evidence of purported insider information being disseminated, and personal information being given to third parties. Unlike the tons of emails and phone calls they receive daily from others on this forum.
When the CEO got my complaint, which I filed on their website, he forwarded it to the attorneys, not me. The attorney then 2 days later contacted me to assure me they had taken corrective actions, which is typically how complaints of this magnitude are handled.
So contrary to your other claims, there was no sharing of information between the attorney and I, they merely were addressing my complaint and to follow up on that with the party making the complaint is standard action.
"""""I think we all better, ignore this person, otherwise, we could be subjected to hearing heresay insider information and might be called on to testify against an outsider wanting inside information for the purpose of controlling NEOM's pps.
I think we better stay away from this outsider, claiming to have inside information until the bad smell of this stuff goes away.
What do you think? ; )"""""""
I think you spend to much time THINKING about how to bash and personally attack another poster. Unlike so many of you here, I provided the attorneys name, and I am sure anyone here who wants to call them, will be told there was a complaint and actions were taken on that complaint. Nothing INSIDE about that at all.
As to your comments about calling the company and wanting to know information, I think I can pull up a few of your posts advocating other posters do exactly that. Unlike me, who has never suggested to anyone here that they contact the company for information.
AI
