NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[brewskih]

""""""""Indeed, the existence and timing of the strategy session itself, info about which was being given out through selective and non-regulated distribution channels, channels which are or were controlled by a few shareholders, is IMHO material information.""""""""

Exactly. When specific dates of when this meeting was to occur were given in that email response, that went beyond any poster here merely speculating that a facilitator may be used to mediate any kind of settlements etc.

And a perfect example of your other point about how information gets distorted using these back channels to disseminate info can be found in the email itself. The author of that email said his source was RICK Pavane, not ROGER Pavane.

On another issue that was discussed here yesterday, its quite interesting that the company has a new IR firm in place as of 1 January, and there is no public announcement or PR to the shareholders, informing them of this major change, in nearly a months time, until someone calls the other day and is told about it by an operator. All the calls that have been talked about on this board and none of the posters were told in a months time period, that there was a new IR company and to call them? All the emails that have been talked about here and the responses from company officials and none of these posters were told to contact the new firm in the future?

But thats ok, some here will spin the information in a light favorable to NEOM and I understand that. Whats important is that Chas Fritz, and Clay Parker from the attorneys office, both saw it the same way I did, as inside information, and took actions to put a stop to it.