I think that essentially means they could not find anyone with WRMA to serve the legal documents.
So I'm thinking they asked for the custodianship to just be immediately applied without serving anyone.
Looks like the judge said "no".
I guess that means they either have to drop the case to try again to serve the papers?
https://www.mylawquestions.com/what-is-an-affidavit-of-non-service.htm
GodBless-NoDoubt
creede
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM