Might I suggest another possibility?
In all of my calls and other DD, I find myself dealing with people that are prohibited from telling you the details that you really want to know. Typically, if it isn’t defined in a filing or a PR…it won’t get directly talked about. When I received answers to many questions, I found that it left far too much latitude for interpretation.
I don’t think MTG is disingenuous nor do I think Andrew is either. I found that I had to constantly redefine the Q & A to get close to the answers…without actually crossing that line and getting them spelled out in black and white.
I think we are just seeing and reading the evidence that different people have different interpretive and commutative abilities. Heck, this board can’t even agree on a unified interpretation of an SEC 14A filing…never mind hours of conversations.
To me, I’m in this for Aero…not the day trade plays.
Just the musings of an old duck hunter from NH…Justin.
Just the musings of an old duck hunter from NH…Justin.