What a bullshiter you are!
Who says 40%?
Klein?
How was that counted? Who did the counting? You?
What ever happened to facts you trumper?
Me think legacy is doing well and i don,t hear any complaints.
Legacy fresh canna has lots traction but Crappy is doomed!
So much for your bullshit testing Happy Crappy.
You do not know what your talking about!
'Misleading' THC and CBD labelling practices prompts letter from Health Canada
Producers told to ensure label matches potency
By SAM RICHES
Alternate text
Labels are placed on bottles of cannabis oil. PHOTO BY DAX MELMER/POSTMEDIA
In March, Mandesh Dosanjh, president and CEO of Pure Sunfarms, wrote a blog post on LinkedIn calling out discrepancies in potency labelling practices among Canadian cannabis companies.
Specifically, Dosanjh wrote that some companies were taking a “static” approach to labelling THC and CBD values, where “one potency label is pre-printed and applied across many batches which fall within a pre-determined range to save on costs.”
“We believe this approach to labelling misleads consumers by creating a false impression about the potency of their dried flower,” he noted.
In a letter obtained by The GrowthOp, Health Canada is now reminding licence-holders that “the THC and CBD content values displayed on a dried cannabis product label should reflect the value as tested for the lot.”
In the letter, which was sent industry-wide, Health Canada states that “labelling practices in which the THC and CBD values displayed on the label of a cannabis product […] that have not been obtained as a result of cannabinoid testing on each lot or batch of cannabis, may result in non-compliance.”
Health Canada further writes that labels derived from “historical cultivar-based results or other practices, do not correspond to an accurate measurement of a specific lot’s THC and CBD content values, and may not correspond to the amounts the cannabis product could yield.”
Dosanjh, who first contacted Health Canada about this issue last December, said he’s happy with what the letter states, but would like to see more information about the potential impact of non-compliance moving forward.
The letter “was very clear on what you can and cannot do and how you should be labelling,” he said.
Dosanjh added that the discrepancies in labelling practices could amount to millions of dollars in savings and revenue for producers who were taking a static approach.
“What I believe certain producers are trying to do is indicate to consumers that the product they were buying was at a higher potency by using an average,” Dosanjh argued. “As a result, I think they probably saved millions of dollars if they were a large producer.”
In February, Pure Sunfarms submitted a complaint about the practice to Health Canada.
According to Bloomberg, which obtained a copy of the complaint, it notes that 18 separate batches of products sold under Canopy Growth’s TWD brand were labelled at 20 per cent THC, and the “statistical likelihood of this many lots coming back with identical test result potencies of precisely 20.0 per cent is extremely low.”
Health Canada also made clear in the letter that “cannabinoid contents can be reasonably rounded and remain compliant with the labelling requirements.” Additionally, the letter states it is acceptable “to use the less-than sign (<) when dealing with quantities of cannabinoids that are less than 0.1 mg or are based on the analytical method’s limitation.”
Health Canada does not recommend labelling products as containing ‘0’ THC or CBD “unless it can be demonstrated with assurance that the product does not contain the relevant cannabinoid.”
“I think that it was all about transparency and doing the right thing for consumers so they can continue to have trust in the industry,” said Dosanjh. “And I absolutely believe that consumers will see this as a sign that certain organizations like Pure Sunfarms want to stand up for the consumer and do the right thing and not prioritize profits over transparency.”
The GrowthOp
