Followers | 44 |
Posts | 7114 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 07/18/2020 |
Thursday, August 12, 2021 10:06:03 PM
KT, I think that would be true in Eminent Domain cases (i.e., Real Property versus Personal Property) where the government comes in and takes your land for a public purpose.
Of course, as I am sure you are aware the local government will low-ball the offer price and the individual(s) whose property is taken contests value with his own appraisal.
But here, the US government was privy to inside information (unknown in the marketplace) in terms of both the nws ("the golden years are ahead") as well as the original taking of the gses in 08.
So, legally does the fact that (1) this is personal property and not real property (2) the government was privy to information unavailable to others and (3) the government had regulatory control and subsequently total control over the manner in which the gses booked future loan reserve losses, DTAS, and legal settlements with lenders matter?
North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 5 oz/ton Gold, 1.5 oz/ton Platinum, 0.5 oz/ton Palladium, and 0.5 oz/ton Rhodium at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Oct 4, 2024 9:15 AM
Basanite, Inc. Appoints Ali Manav as Interim Chief Executive Officer • BASA • Oct 3, 2024 9:15 AM
Integrated Ventures Announces Launch of MedWell Facilities, LLC and Lease Agreement with Giant Fitness Clubs • INTV • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
Beyond the Horizon: Innovative Drug Combinations Offer New Hope for Alzheimer's and More • NVS • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service To Enhance Natural Rubber Industry's Ability to Report on Sustainable and Ethical Supply Chains • SMX • Oct 3, 2024 7:00 AM
Transforming Alzheimer's Treatment: Innovative Combinations to Boost Cognition • PFE • Oct 2, 2024 9:00 AM