Followers | 45 |
Posts | 7114 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 07/18/2020 |
Thursday, August 05, 2021 9:32:13 PM
I'm pretty sure that the SCOTUS said that the anti-injunction and succession clauses DO NOT APPLY TO CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS SUFFERED BY THE SHAREHOLDERS. That seems to naturally include the 5th Amendment Takings Clause.
All Judges are sworn in to take an oath to uphold the US Constitution at their investitures and you could hear the hesitancy in the Judges after the government lawyer suggested to them that the Succession Clause includes Constitutional Claims.
FEATURED POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM
ECGI Holdings Targets $9.7 Billion Equestrian Apparel Market with Allon Brand Launch • ECGI • Jun 25, 2024 8:36 AM
Avant Technologies Addresses Progress on AI Supercomputer-Driven Data Centers • AVAI • Jun 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM