InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 443
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/25/2016

Re: moneycrew post# 177421

Wednesday, 08/04/2021 8:41:13 PM

Wednesday, August 04, 2021 8:41:13 PM

Post# of 232960
Speculation is rampant on Social Media right now, but one thing is clear to me, it is driven by self interest. Regarding the BP, IncellDx and CytoDyn discussion, my guess is that there was an NDA between the parties and now that the company attorneys have publicly opined on those discussions, that confidentiality is now violated, freeing BP to share his side of the story. While I don't know whether my own speculation is on point, if there was an NDA, would not the party violating its provisions be liable for breaching said confidentiality. That said, in the interest of transparency I am a supporter of the activist candidates for the BOD. Some would say that my support is moot because the vote won't happen, however, if all it took was for a BOD and/or their attorneys to object to or invalidate alternative candidates, public company shareholders would be disenfranchised and powerless to vote their preferences. I don't think the system is supposed to work that way and so I think the proxy contest will take place. Then again, none of the above is based on any facts or specific knowledge of what actually occurred between the parties, so for better or worse "the cat is now out of the bag", we shall see which side is bettered.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CYDY News