![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Monday, August 02, 2021 1:05:55 PM
My opinion: Clearly opposite of what SCOTUS actually said.
Fairholme position: According to SCOTUS, FHFA is the government even as a conservator, if acting in public interest. NWS was in public interest. HERA granted FHFA executive powers not held by other conservators or receivers. Conservatorship was imposed illegally as both corporations had met all their capital requirements. FHFA did not conduct the conservatorship under terms promised. Direct claims should proceed.
My opinion: Have read on this board and other places that SCOTUS ruled that only direct claims could proceed. Maybe I missed it, but Fairholme argues that direct claims should proceed, but I didn't see where they argue that derivative claims cannot proceed.
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Provide Positive Developments on Marijuana Breathalyzer Testing • Jul 11, 2024 8:21 AM
ECGI Holdings Enhances Board with Artificial Intelligence (AI) Expert Ahead of Allon Apparel Launch • ECGI • Jul 10, 2024 8:30 AM
Avant Technologies to Meet Unmet Needs in AI Industry While Addressing Sustainability Concerns • AVAI • Jul 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Panther Minerals Inc. Launches Investor Connect AI Chatbot for Enhanced Investor Engagement and Lead Generation • PURR • Jul 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM