Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[cadillacdave]

As 1776 said, maybe a whistleblower comes forward. However, the "workers" are generally not privy to conversations or decision making in the inner circle of upper management. The lady referenced in the article doesn't perceive a problem because she is in upper management and not many folks would step over the line to harass her, due to her position of authority.

Ultimately, I don't see how this helps WDDD in Court. Even if someone says they used or copied the tech. That isn't the issue here. ATVI never denied using the tech!! For years here, I have seen posts about the theft and use of the tech and why we would win the suit. Again focusing on the wrong issue, which was prevalent on this board. ATVI has never denied using the tech. A lot of folks misjudged the issue here and got out in front of their ski's with a lot of the pumping and blue skies mentality that was present here. The real issue has always been if the tech is patent eligible, not if ATVI copied or used the tech. This is why the 101 decision was so important and so many of the self-appointed experts here simply glazed over it, ignoring the real importance of this issue. The simple position of ATVI is that the tech isn't patentable. At least at this point, the Court seems to agree with ATVI.