InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 260
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/04/2018

Re: None

Sunday, 07/25/2021 6:44:46 AM

Sunday, July 25, 2021 6:44:46 AM

Post# of 62076
"So this case boils down to one question: whether HCM has adequately alleged that defendants' electronic cigarette requires combustion. "

And HERE IS THE KICKER FOR HCMC: "If HCM has plausibly alleged that some - even partial - combustion is required, (CAPS mine) THEN THE COURT WILL DENY THE MOTION TO DISMISS".

And here is the kicker for PM: "If, on the other hand HCM's averments that the IQOS device requires a combustion reaction are implausible, (CAPS mine) THEN DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS WILL BE GRANTED".

It has been PROVEN by many people COMBUSTION IS REQUIRED, because it happens above 350 degrees.

Additionally, Team Cozen already stated that they have additional evidence if called upon.

I am not a lawyer but, IMO, this will go in HCMC's favor once Team Cozen presents this evidence.

Make a note of it.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent HCMC News