Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[bcde]

"If that’s truly what SCOTUS intentionally did, they are simply irresponsible."

Surely they did not behave responsibly. They abused the immense power to alter constitution without any ratification normally required for changing constitution.

SCOTUS ruled that there was constitutional violation and Plaintiffs are entitled compensation under taking clause. But SCOTUS refused to rule that the laws (HERA) and FHFA decisions are unlawful. Is this not a contradiction or joke of worst kind?

In simple words, SCOTUS ruled that congress can create unconstitutional laws and executive branch can violate constitution and all are lawful.
Only available justice for people is to seek compensation.

If SCOTUS starts extending this principle, Gov can do any thing, any constitutional violations are lawful and only remedy is compensation.

Look like SCOTUS has abdicated its duty to defend the constitution.