Thank you for the input. I guess I go back to my orIginal question then.
If the endpoints are clinically insignificant, why would the FDA allow trials to be completed, accept an NDA, and then a month before the PDUFA, say that we think you have a clinically insignificant drug?
I know this same issue happens a lot with cancer drugs touting PFS vice OS endpoints and I know the FDA has basically said OS should be the yardstick.
It just seems like waste of everyone’s time and a heck of a lot of money. There is also at least the appearance to the outsider that the company was misled on the validity of their approach
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.