Quest Patent Research Corp (QPRC)

[RagingBobNY]

This is how I see it. I could be wrong and I often am...

Things are changing. The devil is in the details and Jon Scahill is pivoting and making solid moves.

When you talk of nickels and dimes for settlements you have to realize that with less cash to buy IP, you buy lesser IP. Profitable yes. knocking it out of the park? No.

Case in point; In March 2018 Mariner brought patent infringement cases against a bunch of companies. The Mariner patents expired in 2015 so there was only a few years of value in those patents. There is a six or seven year look back after a patent expires. Quick settlement and some quick cash.

Fast forward, Audio Messaging patents expire in 2026, 2027 and 2030. So now you have forward revenue and the whole 20 year life of the patents in what I believe is a hot technology. So the questions here are: In that space of years when did companies start infringing on the patents (the tech wasn't around for 15 years) and what's the value?

Peregrin - Half the patents have the full 20 year value (it's a portfolio and the older patents give strength to the newer patents).
CXT - All three of the patents have full 20 year value.
M Red - More than half the patents have full 20 year value.

Like many of you I first bought the stock well over 20 years ago, (1999 I think) and I want results. I truly believe the leadership is solid and have a road map to grow the business but with the "new" company (Feb funding -26 million), it is going to take time. Time to purchase IP and to get the cases in the dockets and then to move through the courts. Hopefully, the mindset will change from a quick sell to a company to hold. We live in the world of penny stocks and it is chaos.

Lastly, Quest has a unique relationship with their law firm now and that can't hurt!