Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[camaro4me]

In that case, gov't needs to get us out of cship. How long does an impermanent feature last?

There's no breach of the constitution, then there is no constitutional claim.
The Scotus Justices just laid out a hook to maintain expectations of awards that will never come true, because it said that the law authorizes funneling money to the Govt during a Conservatorship.
It isn't an eminent domain case or nationalization because it lacks the permanent feature required in a Taking case.[color=red][/color]
So, the Justices were just deceiving the shareholders about a future award, when, in truth, they just made the case for the Mob's Implied In Fact Contract claim (JPS holders) and the constitutional claim was another lie.

You didn't pay attention to my explanation in the prior comment as to why. Focus.