Hmmm! Hardly seems fair that you are lobbing claims of malfeasance, and you have this beautiful word tree to support your claims. But like I said, I offered you information that you and I could go through together and debate (if you’d like), but you said (and still are saying) “no!”
The basis of your information is rooted in the idea that they are dealing with a “crooked accountant”, so to speak. So, naturally if the accountant is crooked they must be crooked.
Your claim also includes that there is a shared mailing address, and that two of the companies filed an 8-k with that same address.
My theories or potential rebuttals have been posed. But rather than acknowledge the theories or even counter, you simply say, “I don’t care what you show me”. Sounds objective to me.
There may have been a way they did things to stay afloat with the convertible loans, but there was a legitimate transaction that happened at the beginning of this year that took care of ALL of those toxic convertibles. Don’t take my word for it, you can read it for yourself in their most recent 10-q.
While they severed their relationship with Soelect (just one of the partnerships they had on the battery front), we haven’t gotten that message for the other two (TopBattery & Ferroglobe). Until I see an official announcement saying those two partnerships are severed, I can really only continue on with the thought that they are still in play. Can you prove otherwise?
Lastly, they hired a COO, legitimately! Fa-REELZ!!! Even put out an 8-k and Form-4’s to prove it. Oh! That’s right!! Those can’t be believed because that can’t trump your belief that he is part of the scam. Not a real person maybe?!? Nah! That’s not it! I know, if it were true then that is another domino that can no longer be used to scare potential new investors away.
Maybe I am on to something…
