InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 1151
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2019

Re: None

Wednesday, 07/14/2021 3:46:27 PM

Wednesday, July 14, 2021 3:46:27 PM

Post# of 3895
Not sure what everyone has their panties in a bunch for. The call went over the exact (5) points that our letters said they would. The meeting was mandatory, as stated by the courts. That was the last piece of the puzzle that the judge requested. They didn't miss anything. Tuesday is the most important day of this custodianship. If the judge gives dismissal, we are going to have a big move north. From there, we will wait for PR's about merger candidates and for OTC. Nothing has changed here, the issue with the SP is 100% because people thought they would be announcing a lot more than they did. Which is silly, because they stated exactly what they would be talking about and they hit on all of those points.

Furthermore, they had some major technical difficulties, which some people are interpreting as unprofessionalism. It's easy to get flustered and lose your train of thought in that scenario. I don't think that is fair to call it unprofessional. They aren't a company yet, it was a custodian and a lawyer for an OTC, not the Board of directors for a NASDAQ powerhouse. That call was like every other Zoom meeting I have been in, the audio and connection were crap. And to top it off, they were Zoom bombed by a bunch of teenagers with nothing better to do.

If people want to sell based on that, by all means do, but I promise you, if that dismissal goes through on Tuesday, it's only a matter of time until a merger happens. And OTC loves merger news, especially on low floaters, and especially on EV which it will most likely be.
Good luck all, I'm holding tight.

OTC is it's own beast. Treat it as such.