ERHC Energy Inc (ERHE)

[Stakeholder detector]

The Division does not identify and cite to undisputed allegations of the OIP and assert that they entitle it to the relief it seeks, as it must.

ERHC averred in its answer that it had “duly and timeously [sic] filed its periodic reports for over 10 years,” and cited pending litigation subject to a state court “sealing order” as “restraining any disclosure” and “depriving [ERHC] of the resources to meet certain regulatory obligations.” The Division focuses only on ERHC’s concession that its Form 10-Q is delinquent and does not address the substance of its (me: ERHC's that is) answer.

In their response they still did not address this... so the Commission will get a slap on the wrist a second time soon.