BioAmber Inc fka BIOAQ

[Koan]

Nah.

Taking this on point by point on a strictly logical basis...

There are no NDA's since the transaction closed and the bankruptcy and CCAA proceedings ended. The only non-disclosure order that stands is the one from the CCAA judge to Crane pertaining to the Vinmar contract, which has been dead for some time.

Which is it? There are no NDA's or there is "only one"? The NDA pertaining to Crane was created after the alleged transaction closed.

Next...

Even if there were an NDA (and there isn't), those don't let a monitor and 2 federal judges lie in court...

No shit! NDA's don't let people lie. They simply provide that people, businesses, lawyers, or courts do not disclose certain material information to the public. That means not saying certain things. Lying means saying things which are not true. There is a GRAND CANYON of difference between the two.

Next...

Court records thoroughly documented a complete liquidation...

Ahhh, so now it is being framed as a "complete" liquidation. What is wrong with an "exceptional" liquidation? That would be more consistent with how the Canadian judge defined it. One could copy and paste the actual words the judge used, but it has been copied and pasted so many times it is almost embarrassing to highlight that "complete" has never been uttered by any judge in reference to BioAmber Inc.'s case.

And finally...

All of that would be a lie if there were some magically enriching transaction looming, and if the business of the CCAA and bankruptcy courts was not complete, the proceedings would not have been closed.

All of this would have to be a lie (aka - bankruptcy fraud):

The more plausible and common sense answer is that if BioAmber Inc. shares were off the proverbial table, then that would have been easily and publicly dealt with by LAW and in court through either an amendment to articles or an outright share cancellation.

Yet somehow, amazingly, magically, that has never happened.

Every board member, creditor, lawyer and judge involved in the BioAmber Inc. case has never signed off on any such cancellation or any such amendment to articles.

After all, since everything that happened here IS the LAW, why all the secrecy with the fate of the shares? Since it IS the LAW, any share cancellation or amendment to articles would certainly be PUBLIC -- IT CANNOT BE HIDDEN because THAT WOULD BE BANKRUPTCY FRAUD.

Understand?

DO GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY