Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Wise Man]

You mistake a Taking for the money sent to UST during a conservatorship.
What Scotus authorized is the latter, not a Taking or Nationalization that is the seizure of the ownership interest in a property.
A Taking implies a permanent feature, which isn't the case if the actions are only during a conservatorship.
This is why we can't expect a recovery of the funds sent to UST.
The Supreme Court and the plaintiffs are deceiving us, maintaining expectations of a favorable resolution, when what can only be expected is that the JPS holders get an award for an Implied in Fact Contract claim.