InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 4110
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2017

Re: Guido2 post# 688618

Monday, 07/12/2021 12:50:27 PM

Monday, July 12, 2021 12:50:27 PM

Post# of 794282
"That's under APA. SCOTUS also ruled that Collins can pursue their claim under the constitution. Constitution trumps APA.

Read chessmaster's post stickied by Patswil."


Constitutional Avoidance is the principal that, if possible, the Supreme Court should avoid ruling on constitutional issues, and resolve the cases before them on other (usually statutory) grounds.

Why would SCOTUS rule on constitutional issue, when it could have resolved the issue by correctly interpreting clause ("acting in the interest of agency") or on the basis of APA. It could have easily abolished HERA because HERA is a wrong law created for wrong agency FHFA and wrong companies FnF.

SCOTUS has opened Pandora's box with its ruling on Collin's petition.