Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[chessmaster315]

the government not overstepping its bounds does not mean
shareholders can not "get relief" from their "injury" of the third amendment sweep.

To the contrary (number 3) a decision in the shareholders favor "could easily lead to an award of at least some of the relief shareholders seek".

1...shareholders have standing..
2.....shareholders injury is traceable to adoption and implementation of the third amendment..
3. ..a decision in the shareholders favor could easily lead to an award of at least some of the relief shareholders seek.
4...the shareholders constitutional claim is not moot.
5...shareholder constitutional claim can proceed...
6...the harm allegedly caused by the third amendment did not come to an end....
7..The answer to that question could have a bearing on the scope of the relief that may be awarded to shareholders...
8...That does not mean, however, that the shareholders have no entitlement to retrospective relief.

Source of all quotes: Collins vs Yellen
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-422_k537.pdf