Worth Posting in full below:
Neither Wienstein, nor Malone are anti-vaccine, but the extreme censoring of both Dr Bret Weinstein and Dr Robert Malone (who is attributed with the founding of the mRNA vaccine platform) ... speaks volumes on the concern they express about Moderna and PFE mRNA vaccines and suppression of discussion of use of Ivermectin for limiting very early stages consequences of or prophylactic use for preventing Covid-19.
The "suppression" and "censorship" of any discussion, which cannot be had, unless it is the official FDA/CDC versions...is beyond "Alarming"...and it should be to anyone who claims to be a "scientist."
Those who suppress...obviously cannot support their positions, or cannot refute those expressing the opposite. AND IMO THAT IS DANGEROUS, especially when they are attempting to inject it into the arms of Children!
________________________________________________________________________
Single most qualified' mRNA expert speaks about vaccine risks after he says YouTube banned his video
Lawrence Richard
June 24, 2021·3 min read
The man who invented the mRNA technology used in some coronavirus vaccines says he was censored by YouTube for sharing his concerns on the vaccines in a podcast.
"[O]ne of my concerns are that the government is not being transparent with us about what those risks are. And so, I'm of the opinion that people have the right to decide whether to accept a vaccine or not, especially since these are experimental vaccines," said Dr. Robert Malone during a Wednesday segment on Fox News's Tucker Carlson Tonight, saying YouTube deleted a video of him speaking about the associated risks.
Opening the segment, Carlson shared some studies showing heart inflammation and death correlating with the use of the vaccines.
"A Norwegian study conducted of 100 nursing home residents who died after receiving Pfizer's corona shots. They found that at least 10 of those deaths were likely caused by the vaccine. 10%," Carlson said.
JOHN MCAFEE FOUND DEAD IN SPANISH PRISON CELL
"Young adults in the prime of their lives are being forced to take the vaccine because Tony Fauci said that," he said, contending Malone’s expertise makes him "the single most qualified" person to share information about the technology and warrants him "a right to speak."
Malone clarified that he was not discouraging the use of the vaccine but was providing people with as much fair information as he could about their risks.
"This is a fundamental right having to do with clinical research ethics," he said. "And so, my concern is that I know that there are risks. But we don't have access to the data, and the data haven't been captured rigorously enough so that we can accurately assess those risks — and therefore … we don't really have the information that we need to make a reasonable decision."
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
"That's one of my other objections, is that we toss about these words, risk-benefit analysis, casually as if it's a very deep science. It's not. Normally, at this stage, the CDC [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] would have performed those risk-benefit analyses. They would be data-based and science-based. They're not right now," Malone said.
Malone also said he has "a bias that the benefits probably don't outweigh the risks" for younger people who are being encouraged or required to take the vaccine.
"I can say that the risk-benefit ratio for those 18 and below doesn't justify vaccines, and there's a pretty good chance that it doesn't justify vaccination in these very young adults," he added.
Malone discovered in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection when he was at the Salk Institute in 1988, and he subsequently invented mRNA vaccines, which are being used over 20 years later to combat the spread of the coronavirus.
YouTube told the Washington Examiner of the video that while it is "open [to] discussions of potential treatments and clinical trials related to COVID-19 on YouTube, based on guidance from the CDC, FDA and other local health authorities, we don’t currently allow content that recommends Ivermectin as an effective treatment or prevention method for the virus."
"As such, we removed content from Bret Weinstein's channels that violated this policy. We craft our policies to prevent the risk of egregious real-world harm, and update them as official guidance evolves. We do allow exceptions to our policy about Ivermectin, including content that also gives viewers the full context of the FDA’s current position."9.
