Just to be clear, neither the company's BoD candidates, whoever they may be, nor the candidates already nominated by the 13D nominating group, can present their case in any depth or detail until the respective Proxy Statements are approved by the S.E.C. All conflicts of interests, current and future, must be disclosed when presentations are eventually made to stockholders. Thus far, we only have one slate of nominees waiting on S.E.C. sanction, so it is amazing that so many people have already made up their minds without the benefit of knowing who all the candidates will be. I have learned never to assume anything and it would not shock me to learn one or more of the current CYDY directors will not be on the Proxy card. I am looking forward to learning what all candidates have to say, particularly those I have never heard speak or read.
IMO, in this age of "google search", if candidates are not transparent, the electorate will eventually sniff the BS and embrace those who are mindful of the truth. I do get the impression, that 90% of people who post on MBs, have dug their heels in so hard in favor of one point of view or another, that even the most compelling facts and/or well reasoned presentations have no impact on how they will vote. It reminds me of the phenomena of "cognitive dissonance", where no matter the reality, people can't allow themselves to see it because it is incompatible with long held or existing attitudes and opinions. I wish us all discernment and wisdom to make the right decision when we vote, because the fate of Leronlimab and the patients it can help, hangs in the balance.
