Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

No question that the LP CONTINUES THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL TAKING OF THE SHAREHOLDERS PROPERTY!

Post Collins, CAN THE COLLINS PLAINTIFFS ASK THE JUDGE TO AMEND THEIR COMPLAINT TO INCLUDE RELIEF FROM THE UNCONSTITIONALLY INSULATED DIRECTOR AND THE CREATION OF AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 4TH AMENDMENT? This is above my pay grade and I'd rather you not ask David Thompson, unless you are a litigant as I am pretty sure he is super busy designing and strategizing a new attack on this Unconstitutional infringement of our property rights!

Here's what the FINANCIALLY CLUELESS SCOTUS SAID: "And because that amendment eliminated the
variable dividend formula that had caused the sharehold-
ers’ injury, it is necessary to consider whether the fourth
amendment moots the shareholders’ constitutional claim.
It does so only with respect to some of the relief re-
quested. In their complaint, the shareholders sought vari-
ous forms of prospective relief, but because that amend-
ment is no longer in place, the shareholders no longer have
any ground for such relief."