InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 7696
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/24/2007

Re: jaymark post# 51520

Friday, 07/02/2021 2:21:50 PM

Friday, July 02, 2021 2:21:50 PM

Post# of 57170
“Claims which were signed off on as being valid at the RMOTC?”

Jaymark RMOTC did nothing of the sorts. They concluded that the device “may” warrant further investigation and yet they would not authorize any further grants for additional testing. Then they closed up shop!

China test...failed not a word didn’t even get the equipment back

Tcpl test- failed miserably after operating less more than 36 hours and was a total disaster! Current CEO and technical director bailed weeks before it’s deployment!

Kmi test also failed in the same manner even though it wasn’t even moving heavy crude. If Aot can’t move lease condensate then how would it ever be effective on viscous crude? Btw company took years to acknowledge that the KMI deal was dead and still float out the ridiculous “continued interest” theory!

The pay to play demo site should have been the last nail in the coffin but they may continue to extract cash from unwary investors. The yield warning will make that much difficult.

In short every test failed and I’m not even bringing up Elektra and Magchargr fuel injection fake products that were universally panned.



Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent QSEP News