![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Tuesday, June 29, 2021 6:20:39 AM
He was a common shareholder who forced a shareholder meeting through a completely legit and legal court proceeding. The court found no objections to the case he brought forth and the judge did not either as the judge fully signed off.
The case then went to a shareholder meeting where a new ceo was appointed. The new ceo is NOT Miller. As stated by the current ceo, Miller has no official capacity in this current company and is only a common shareholder.
Whatever he may have done 4/5 years ago is irrelevant now with this current company.
Again, I will wait for anyone to provide proof that this was “hijacked”. Forcing a shareholder meeting to elect a new ceo through a legal court proceeding where a judge signed off can in no way be considered “hijacking”.
If there was any example of “hijacking” going on here, please provide proof. I will wait...
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM