Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

I think Kagan said that because the 5th Circuit EnBanc Panel ruling (with I believe a 1 vote majority) thought that ONLY prospective relief in the form of striking the for cause provision was appropriate. Do you remember during orals, a high pitched female Judge said towards the end of the hearing,"We know what the POTUS wanted because he wouldn't have had his Treasury Secretary sign the nws!", thus she was implying that somehow the POTUS wasn't harmed by the unconstitionally insulated FHFA Director. But that can be debated now at trial.