InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 2839
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/25/2019

Re: None

Wednesday, 06/23/2021 2:41:25 PM

Wednesday, June 23, 2021 2:41:25 PM

Post# of 793208
So remember the letter from Biden's DOJ? It's going to take a long time and the liquidation pref will continue to increase. At some point though, they will exit conservatorship but will need to pay 10% of the liquidation pref or the delta they made from the prior quarter.

I suspect at some point in the future after the companies have met the capital requirement that the dividend payment will become more reasonable but here we are ...

March 18, 2021
Honorable Scott S. Harris
Clerk
Supreme Court of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20543

Re: Collins v. Yellen, No. 19-422, and Yellen v. Collins, No. 19-563

Dear Mr. Harris:

On January 14, 2021, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), as conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, announced amendments to the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements between Treasury and FHFA on behalf of Fannie and Freddie. The text of the amendments is enclosed with this letter.

The most recent amendments, among other things, modify the Third Amendment’s variable dividend formula and waiver of periodic commitment fees. The amendments instead establish a new compensation formula that allows the enterprises to build up substantial capital reserves. They provide that, until an enterprise builds up enough capital to meet certain thresholds - a process that is expected to take multiple years - the enterprise will compensate Treasury through increases in the liquidation preference rather than through variable cash dividends.


They further provide that, after the enterprise builds up the specified amount of capital, the enterprise will make quarterly dividend payments equal to the lesser of 10 percent of Treasury’s liquidation preference or the incremental increase in the enterprise’s net worth in the previous quarter and will pay periodic commitment fees.


The amendments do not moot these cases. The shareholders have sought both (1) prospective relief prohibiting the continued implementation of the Third Amendment’s dividend formula and (2) retrospective relief ordering the return of dividends already paid under that formula. See J.A. 117-118. The new amendments modify the Third Amendment’s dividend formula going forward, but they do not refund dividend payments that were made in the past or otherwise provide retrospective relief.

I would appreciate your distributing this letter to the Members of the Court.