Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[camaro4me]

This is patent law, but the language applies to us also.

Bye bye pspa

Do a search on 'seve'

p. 23-24

case that presents a conflict between the Constitution and
Opinion of the Court statute, we give “full effect” to the Constitution and to whatever portions of the statute are “not repugnant” to the
Constitution, effectively severing the unconstitutional portion of the statute.

p. 28-29

For most of this Nation’s history, an issued patent was
considered a vested property right that could be taken from
an individual only through a lawful process before a court.
Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group,
LLC, 584 U. S. ___, – (2018) (GORSUCH, J., dissenting) (slip op., at 8–10). I continue to think this Court’s recent decision in Oil States—upsetting this traditional understanding and allowing officials in the Executive Branch
to “cancel” already-issued patents—departed from the Constitution’s separation of powers. But it would be an even
greater departure to permit those officials to withdraw a
vested property right while accountable to no one within the
Executive Branch.

Have any of you degenerates read the Arthrex opinion that came out today regarding severability and remedy? That should give you all a clue.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-1434_ancf.pdf