InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 1224
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2014

Re: None

Saturday, 06/19/2021 10:45:59 PM

Saturday, June 19, 2021 10:45:59 PM

Post# of 140474
Reply 128715 Belize, voting or discussing the conditional clauses to qualify for additional options is not a confidentiality issue that would be in conflict with the partnership. A discussion about options would be made public in future SEC filings. Those meetings were intended to discuss "privileged" subject matter that would be in direct conflict with the partnership interest. Which was the EXACT purpose for including that provision in the loan agreement. Advanced warning.

Why would the Board add so many with BO experience if they weren't going to discuss all of their options before THE event? You could just hire them as consultants and ask for an analysis. Instead they were submitted for Board positions. They needed to better understand the nuances of the company and all of the inner workings to have a better understanding of the development process, how they make things out of thin air and the effects of those R&D patents on the competitive landscape. IMO.

That was easy to figure out.

Good luck to all. Regards,BK.