Associate similarities.
Greetings Xeroe,
you see no correlation to the link I provided - and I see several correlations.
That article I linked describes something that was not "ever supposed to happen" with Crypto - and yet it did. All these variations of Crypto currency, business models for funding, for safety, etc, all have a common thread of Crypto being risky for valuation but very safe on all other issues.
Yet just this week - we're seeing variations to that concept - with the one I linked to as just one of several different types.
So what is my point? The crowd funding, real estate funding, Crypto financing, and specialty variations and selling channels for various Crypto products and currencies etc. etc. are for more confusing to investors than most one to admit.
Numerous people posting here want to make it sound simple, safe, and virtually certain of success - and that is a difficult mix to actually deliver to investors.
Daily if you're really doing your due diligence - you come across another Crypto "Coin Base like entity effort" or another financing or funding effort or another alliance effort - and always with acronyms attached.
People read into things what they want to - you (Xeroe) expects each article to apply to your choices - without reasoning its what applies to the investors that may or may not buy the stock - that is meaningful and will determine the interest or lack of interest in your stock.
My point is there is far greater risk than Crypto proponents want to admit - and most investors see the word Crypto - and lump all those different business models into the same category.
Good companies understand people - they recognize the needs for educating (not just describing what they do). Imagine the false logic that changing the name of the company will somehow cause investors to accept and better understand the company . . . it doesn't work that way. There are no shortcuts to getting better quality investor interest and participation.
And stories like several of these this week like the one I linked on my post - scare the heck out of investors already thoroughly confused.
Xeroe - you think you understand the differences - and that may or may not be true - but what you don't understand is you are in an infinitesimal minority - and that isn't good to expect there are lots of those.
We want and need lots of investors to improve the pricing and participation and longevity of CYIO - we don't need tricks or confused descriptions and confused conditions.
JMHO
