InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 3893
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/28/2005

Re: paige post# 17284

Tuesday, 01/23/2007 5:08:01 PM

Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:08:01 PM

Post# of 45771
Paige, yes it does to me. If a foreign substance interfers with the spectral region of interest and alters the fingerprint the test result should be "not validated".

However, that has nothing to do with whether the sample is sterile or non-sterile. The sample could still be either.

A "validated" result does not imply the sample is sterile and a "not validated" result does not imply the sample is non-sterile.

Valimed doesn't know.

The introduction of a foreign substance causing non-sterility may or may not fluoresce at all, or may not fluoresce in the spectral ROI thereby altering the fingerprint.

Believe me, if Valimed could determine sterility it would be advertised in no uncertain terms so there would be absolutely NO QUESTION ABOUT IT!!! ##$@@##**&&^!! (TM- Closer)

What was described to you was a scenario where Valimed may unknowingly not validate a sample as a result of non-sterility.




Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.