InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 64
Posts 3948
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/08/2013

Re: A deleted message

Saturday, 06/12/2021 7:57:10 AM

Saturday, June 12, 2021 7:57:10 AM

Post# of 803675
Much of what you posted, especially at first, I agree with.
I was likewise shocked at asking for 29 billion and it should have been 300 billion or more.

However, are you an expert on Scotus law? How many cases have you tried before Scotus?

I thought so. zero.

No, we dont always understand the attorney's reasons for what he does. If we understood it all, then we could have filed Collins vs USA PRO SE. And, YOU too, can file your own lawsuits instead of complaining about those who coughed up the money.

Typically, plaintiffs ask the court for "way more" than they expect to get. But this is not a typical case. Its Scotus, and its truly David vs Goliath.

We have to trust our attorney. Otherwise, we should fire him, and those "with the money" have not done that.

Remember, "we dont know everything".

Once you accept we dont have "knowledge of the (fnma) universe", you can accept that our attorney, who has a vested interest in the outcome, has our backs.

Ackman, Pagliara hired Cooper and Kirk and have invested millions.
Pagliara is an attorney, and recognizes he, too, is not an expert on Supreme Court law.

The know it all thinks he is an "expert on everything". I found it better to understand, or even embrace our areas of expertise, and to engage experts on it, rather than try to "be our own attorney" and judge of everything.

Im sure Ackman "vetted" our attorney Thompson, before he handed him a check for millions.

Im not in a financial position to hire Cooper and Kirk, but we can still "get on the train" because billionaires have done this for us.
Yea, they did it for themselves, but we can position ourselves to profit likewise.

"Your attacks" on people based on "your opinion" 29 billion is not enough, is unjustified. Sure, I agree more is better, but the strategy of asking for less, instead of more, is brilliant.

Unwinding the NWS would result in hundreds of billions for shareholders.

Attorney Thompson wisely did not use the "spagetti" method, where you throw every thing at the wall and see what sticks.

Instead, he took a humble approach, asked for 1/10 "just compensation" to show Scotus his integrity. I have seen this "humble" strategy work before.

We have friends who had an option to buy on their rental home.
They decided to exercise the option. However, the down payment was a problem.

So, they asked for help with the DP, after thoughtful prayer.
The seller decided after all the help they did (their neighbor), they signed the entire home over to them..gratis..no mortgage. They humbly asked for less and got more. Humility is a good thing.