B52 and Misiu
Everything you are saying and the contents of this video are true in my opinion.
The government and FDA/NIH pushing the vaccination program despite its risks including:
lack of biological testing,
persistence of the spike protein in the blood/body,
concentration of the lipid substances (and possibly other vaccine substances) in lymph, bone marrow and ovaries,
inadequate, underreported and biased accounting for adverse effects and use of the VAERS,
inadequate followup to the vaccines,
bias and censorship in the media to quash the reporting of alternative views on the efficacy and prudence of the vaccine campaign,
and the dismissal of use of already approved drugs such as vitamin D3, zinc, hydroxychloroquin, ivermectin and fluvoxamine as preventatives and in the early stage of the disease.
There doesn't seem to be any accounting for the short and long term effects of the vaccines and the evolution of escape mutants and antibody dependent enhancement of the virus. I should say that I am not an anti-vaxer. I have gotten both shots of the Pfizer vaccine. I work as an ER doc and I have risk factors. I was in the Peace Corps where I got vaccinated for everything under the sun. I have probably had more than 200 vaccinations in my life.
The discussions in the video also reveal the group-thinking and inherent biases in the regulatory agencies that CytoDyn is up against. This all leads me to believe that approval in the US will be difficult until we have at least a statistically significant trial in another country or until some changes in the FDA occur. The approval of the Biogen Alzheimer drug on such scanty evidence of reducing amyloid plaque without clinical improvement has stirred up further controversy about FDA policies and practices. Perhaps this will bring closer scrutiny of FDA policies and result in some change.
As many have noted on this board, if CytoDyn were treated in the same as Gilead or Biogen we would have an EUA.
