The site has been very quiet. One thought/question: How is it possible for it to be legal for Jim to have stated that all (about 6 at that time) the products were "market ready" when on any rational basis none of them were. In retrospect it's difficult to even refer to most of them as products, let alone market ready. Did that now deceased delusionary grifter get to define "market ready"?
On another topic. I never looked at my private mail. Quite a few months ago a couple of people left me private messages to which I failed to respond. I never saw them until just recently. My apologies.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.