Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

Definitions of what?

I just told you in my previous response: A definition of what the incidental Conservator power is!

You are simply stating that other courts have read that the incidental power provision (that the nws may be in the best interests of the FHFA) allows for the nws. Judge Thomas in his dissent yesterday, said that the definitions section of the statute describes EXACTLY what "unauthorized access" means.

So, where in the definitions section of HERA does it list EXACTLY WHAT THE INCIDENTAL POWERS OF A CONSERVATOR ARE?

That's why I'm still confused about your 1 or 2 liner from the other day.

How specifically does the 1st couple of paragraphs from yesterdays Thomas dissent not bode well for the Collins Plaintiffs?

Let me guess (that's really all one can do with your 1 to 4 liner posts) is it this line from the dissent: "Foremost, that interpretation is contrary to the plain
meaning of the text. "?

And because the incidental powers in HERA (that are NOT defined in the definitions section of HERA) says "may do what is in the best interests of the FHFA" that the nws is valid and therefore that does not bode well for the Collins Plaintiffs?

Is that what you are trying to say?