We shall leave it to the future to show the desirability of our well-patented cameras and imaging technology. If they should happen to be adapted to some future Medtronic hardware, or JnJ (I knod of like how often JnJ has been creeping into these conversations lately!) then we will know what I mean by Highly Touted. It seems they just can't talk much about it publicly yet, which I take as an additional indicator.
When was the last time we heard a surgeon speak about Enos? Can't say I ever have. They spoke very highly of the old SPORT platform which, despite being "highly touted" by a number of surgeons who used it in early trials, was considered rudimentary enough that it needed some additional development. And it sounds like it has gotten everything it needed. Do you think there are no surgeons in and out of Chapel Hill, playing with the hardware, offering input for final refinement of control algorithms, etc.? Not without some pretty solid non-disclosure agreement as well, I'm sure. Standard practice for a development company. As soon as they are allowed to speak about their experiences, I expect they will, and I for one don't think I will be disappointed with their Key Opinions.
Message in reply to:
What do you mean the cameras are “ highly touted”.
By whom? MacNally?
Can you show us one instance where someone outside the company “ highly touted” the cameras??
BTW when was the last time we heard a SURGEON speak about enos?
Where are the KOL’s?
Nothing
