InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 206
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/21/2017

Re: happy gylmore post# 4682

Thursday, 05/27/2021 2:30:22 PM

Thursday, May 27, 2021 2:30:22 PM

Post# of 6708
Such ambiguity

please...enlighten me. If ALLM can take liberties in what they say to promote investor interest of their tech without backing it with solid data, then they must be challenged on whatever claims they do make. The patent for one. Since they are not producing anything, nor show what they have created so far on their V.4, what are you left with other than baseless claims not supported by fact? Their boilerplate block flow diagrams are standard issue conceptual ideas that are based on individual tech that already exists. What I have provided is the reality that they face. Not now in the lab, but certainly at pilot, demo and commercial scales. It's been 3 years now since the reorganization and you still haven't seen and pictures, hard evidence of the CTS process.

Reality is they are going to need more than $3M to get further and into pilot scale / demo scale. To do that, you need to prove to big money that you can do what you claim...make sugars at least as cheap as gen 1 corn / sugar cane ethanol producers. This patent shows otherwise.

You really should take a hard look at why >90% of these companies are no longer in the business and those that are, are corn based.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent BIOF News