a ton of companies are much worse delinquent and custodianships are not awarded. i am sorry people, i dont' agree with you. i think the company wins this. no reasonable judge is gonna turn the company lose to a random shareholder, when there is a 12-person team that has been getting paid by the company. a ton of companies were delinquent before, during and now after covid. but, every custodianship that is sought is not won. again, for the last time, the STATUTE regarding custodianships is what the judge will use to make her decision. i do not think sharp and his attorney have met that burden. i don't. that is my opinion. i think he has a 5% chance to keep custodianship at this point. and i think his attorney will be even better prepared by monday to answer judge's questions about operations. sharp's "words" and "opinions" about retc operations and his conjecture based on revocation status at the time and sec delinquency are not sufficient imo. they don't meet the standard of the statute when you consider the company's testimony, their updated corporate status, and the audit in process to get current with sec. i think they have proven what they need to at this point. the judge seems fair, so i don't think she will rule against the company.
