InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1171
Posts 34538
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/26/2007

Re: Screwdriverx post# 3044

Friday, 05/14/2021 12:37:24 AM

Friday, May 14, 2021 12:37:24 AM

Post# of 13742
Philip Binzel, M.D. Explained!!! Modern medicine, with its firm grasp of the art of making huge amounts of profits, has totally brainwashed the public into thinking that the size of every tumor is important in a cancer treatment.

http://thecancerexchange.com/shrinktumors/

How important is shrinking tumors?
In many cases, it is critical to the survival of a cancer patient to shrink their tumors. However in many other cases, it is not life-threatening to leave a tumor alone and concentrate on stopping the spread of cancer.

Modern medicine, with its firm grasp of the art of making huge amounts of profits, has totally brainwashed the public into thinking that the size of every tumor is important in a cancer treatment.
In many cases shrinking the tumor is critical. However, orthodox medicine frequently shrinks tumors which are irrelevant to the survival of the patient. Here is a quote by Dr. Philip Binzel, M.D.:

“When a patient is found to have a tumor, the only thing the doctor discusses with that patient is what he intends to do about the tumor. If a patient with a tumor is receiving radiation or chemotherapy, the only question that is asked is, “How is the tumor doing?” No one ever asks how the patient is doing. In my medical training, I remember well seeing patients who were getting radiation and/or chemotherapy. The tumor would get smaller and smaller, but the patient would be getting sicker and sicker. At autopsy we would hear, “Isn’t that marvelous! The tumor is gone!” Yes, it was, but so was the patient. How many millions of times are we going to have to repeat these scenarios before we realize that we are treating the wrong thing?

In primary cancer, with only a few exceptions, the tumor is neither health-endangering nor life-threatening. I am going to repeat that statement. In primary cancer, with few exceptions, the tumor is neither health-endangering nor life-threatening. What is health-endangering and life-threatening is the spread of that disease through the rest of the body.

There is nothing in surgery that will prevent the spread of cancer.
There is nothing in radiation that will prevent the spread of the disease.
There is nothing in chemotherapy that will prevent the spread of the disease. How do we know? Just look at the statistics.
There is a statistic known as survival time. Survival time is defined as that interval of time between when the diagnosis of cancer is first made in a given patient and when that patient dies from his disease.


In the past 50 years, tremendous progress has been made in the early diagnosis of cancer.
In that period of time, tremendous progress had been made in the surgical ability to remove tumors.
Tremendous progress has been made in the use of radiation and chemotherapy in their ability to shrink or destroy tumors.
But, the survival time of the cancer patient today is no greater than it was 50 years ago.

What does this mean?
It obviously means that we are treating the wrong thing.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.