retc management hired great and successful lawyers to challenge his bid for custodianship. there are many reasons not to award him custodianship, but i will digress. everybody thought it was over last friday, but it wasn't. it would not surprise me if sharp has reconsidered that retc is not a good choice for custodianship. lot's of financial problems. not even close to being worth dealing with. i think sharp knows it but is saving face. his hands would be tied with the company in many ways. they have a real business and operations in place. ask yourself why the company got a top notch law firm to defend itself. retc is a far fetch from being in the bag for sharp, imo. far fetch. and i think it will be revealed when they go to court.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.