My opinion on contacting the company on a constant basis is:
The more shareholders place calls and depending on the content and context and redundancy of said calls, the more likely the company will apply policy and controls in communication with shareholders, the more time is taken up, the more likely they will change their availabilty and further perpetuate a communication and relationship breakdown between shareholder and company.
This company is new and in a developmental stage (under construction) It is important to keep this in mind. They have not been selling EI products for 7 or 8 years. They need to lay the foundation for their (our) company. So, if we are truely partners with EI and I beleive we are, then we are somewhat a part of their team, (an assest) perhaps as we move forward we can establish a good Investor relationship and continue to offer support and encouragement. I also am committed to a system of checks and balances or accountability.
I also think this stock at .02 cents would trade very well, I think it would trade well at 2.00, people would come, why its so low is odd and its wasting money, when imho, if the stock began to climb they would see growing and continued support from the investment community. The only thing the low price is doing now is locking people in when they buy and then lowering the PPS and trapping our money, yes it has a downward pattern from the past months and its trapping money as it goes, hitting the triples will be unfortunate (under valued) IMO. But if they want to trap more money, then the triples we will go. What happens at .0001, I don't know. Clint is going to learn about decisions and the impact they have on things. CEO or not he has not had the experience of success and failure many of us have had. We've all seen the ultra successful, financially independent go BK. The best of them have experienced that. Here's to hoping Clint is prudent about what he thinks he knows, I hope he knows how to anticipate the unexpected and maintains an ethical standard for a Chief Executive Corporate Officer, there are standards and they matter. At his age it may be tempting to take what appears to be short cuts (short term short cuts) that hurt investors financially, It is important to remind executives about integrity,honesty and accountability to the shareholders.
Going from A/S 2.3 the other day to 2.5B after annoucing 2.3 and not annoucing (I understand) the increase seems or could appear as sneeky or dishonest. These are red flags and merit clarification from the company. IMO, hounding them will do no good only close doors of communication rather than opening doors of opportunity
Question: How are the 504's related to an increased A/S count. I realize they have 200m 504's but where did they get to 2.5 A/S is that the 200million in the 504 financing? If so then we were informed by management. I need clarification, I thought the 200 was included in the 2.3 A/S count. tia
Salt Creek
