Robert, you seem to have a serious problem understanding English. You assume that 99% agreed with the plaintiffs? Where did you get that number from? To the best of my knowledge, less that 15% of the totality of shareholders ever posted on any boards at the highest. The fact that only a handful opted out does not mean that the rest agreed with the SA. Did they have any choice? Not at all. You and the other plaintiffs, your counsel, the Boys and MP made sure that shareholders will be placed in a "blackmail" position: either accept the Settlement and continue to be played like a fiddler, or opt out and lose. How dumm you think shareholders are? Your plan was good, but very wicked and to a certain point illegal. You know that, I know that, the attorneys know that, the Judge knows that. Before any impartial Judge or jury, all five plaintiffs would have been disqualified, the attorney would have been forced to answer questions about serious irregularities committed during the process, and the Boys would have been held accountable for all the wrong doing that both the DA and the CA describe. JUSTICE WAS SERIOUSLY MOCKED. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to see that the APA was an illegal act, even as both Kamber and Cantor told me so. The very existence of CDEX is an illegal act, a transaction held between a few to benefit themselves, to the detriment of the big majority of shareholders.
Don't quote me numbers and percentages. 99% of the shareholders had no say in any action decided on "their behalf" in the last 4 or so years. And stating that I am blaming 99% who agreed with the Settlement (which is not true) is far from the truth. I never blamed any shareholders of anything, I blame you and the other plaintiffs, the attorneys, the Boys and the Judge. The whole Settlement is a slap in the face of JUSTICE. Justice, in my books, is not democratic.
But I still have faith that, sooner rather than later, justice will prevail and the responsible parties will pay for their wicked deeds.
AI
