Home > Boards > Free Zone > All Trading - Technical > Abet Chichi2 (Chichi2)

The Q Ratio and Market Valuation: April Update

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
DiscoverGold Member Profile
Member Level 
Followed By 574
Posts 77,679
Boards Moderated 44
Alias Born 03/10/04
160x600 placeholder
DiscoverGold Member Level  Wednesday, 05/05/21 09:41:45 AM
Re: None
Post # of 73802 
The Q Ratio and Market Valuation: April Update
By: David Larew | May 4, 2021

Extrapolating Q

The ratio subsequent to the latest Z.1 Fed data (through 2020 Q3) is based on a subjective process that factors in the monthly closes for the Vanguard Total Market ETF (VTI).

Unfortunately, the Q Ratio isn't a very timely metric. The Z.1 data is over two months old when it's released, and three additional months will pass before the next release. To address this problem, our monthly updates include an estimate for the more recent months based on changes in the VTI price (the Vanguard Total Market ETF) as a surrogate for Corporate Equities; Liability.

The first chart shows the Q Ratio from 1900 to the present.

Interpreting the Ratio

The data since 1945 is a simple calculation using data from the Federal Reserve Z.1 Statistical Release, section B.103, Balance Sheet and Reconciliation Tables for Nonfinancial Corporate Business. Specifically, it is the ratio of Market Value divided by Replacement Cost. It might seem logical that fair value would be a 1:1 ratio. But that has not historically been the case. The explanation, according to Smithers & Co. (more about them later) is that "the replacement cost of company assets is overstated. This is because the long-term real return on corporate equity, according to the published data, is only 4.8%, while the long-term real return to investors is around 6.0%. Over the long-term and in equilibrium, the two must be the same."

The average (arithmetic mean) Q Ratio is about 0.79. The chart below shows the Q Ratio relative to its arithmetic mean of 1 (i.e., divided the ratio data points by the average). This gives a more intuitive sense to the numbers. For example, the all-time Q Ratio high at the peak of the Tech Bubble was 2.17 — which suggests that the market price was 174% above the historic average of replacement cost. The all-time lows in 1921, 1932 and 1982 were around 0.28, which is approximately 62% below replacement cost. That's quite a range. The latest data point is 310% above the mean. Remember, this is extrapolated using the monthly VTI close and the most recent Q Ratio - which is 2.64 as of Q3 2020.

Another Means to an End
Smithers & Co., an investment firm in London, incorporates the Q Ratio in their analysis. In fact, CEO Andrew Smithers and economist Stephen Wright of the University of London co-authored a book on the Q Ratio, Valuing Wall Street. They prefer the geometric mean for standardizing the ratio, which has the effect of weighting the numbers toward the mean. The chart below is adjusted to the geometric mean, which, based on the same data as the two charts above, is 364%.

The Message of Q: Overvaluation

Of course, periods of over-and under-valuation can last for many years at a time, so the Q Ratio is not a useful indicator for short-term investment timelines. This metric is more appropriate for formulating expectations for long-term market performance. As we can see in the next chart, peaks in the Q Ratio are correlated with secular market tops - the Tech Bubble peak and current market values being extreme outliers.

For a quick look at the two components of the Q Ratio calculation, here is an overlay of the two since the inception of quarterly Z.1 updates in 1952. There is an obvious similarity between the Fed's estimate of "Corporate Equities; Liabilities" and a broad market index, such as the S&P 500 or VTI. It is the more volatile of the two, but this component can be easily extrapolated for the months following the latest Fed data. The less volatile underlying Net Worth is not readily estimated from coincident indicators.

The regressions through the two data series to help to illustrate the secular trend toward higher valuations.

Read Full Story »»»


Information posted to this board is not meant to suggest any specific action, but to point out the technical signs that can help our readers make their own specific decisions. Caveat emptor!
• DiscoverGold
Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
Current Price
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist
Consent Preferences