Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[DJPele]

Have you ever received confirmation that the China deal - or any other deal that died in the last 13 years - is dead? NO! All those deals have been made to pump up the PPS so Stevie could sell shares. And then they die a slow dead...

1.) What does the China deal have to do with Pasaca and Innova? We have confirmation of a deal and distribution agreement with Pasaca, right here:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1403570/000149315221002306/0001493152-21-002306-index.htm

We see the relationship with Pasaca and Innova with Quantum Materials in these provided links:

https://pasacacapital.com/

https://pasacacapital.com/case-study/quantum-materials/

https://innovamedgroup.com/

https://innovamedgroup.com/qmc-healthid/

https://mpsmedical-inc.com/

And "pumping up the PPS" is opinion. Next.

And if you want confirmation; Not getting current on the SEC filings last month is a breach of contract. It was a condition clearly mentioned in the contract, and that didn't happen.

2.) IAW the SEC filings:

(b) Maturity Date. The “Maturity Date” shall mean March 31, 2021. The Holder shall have one (1) option to extend the Maturity Date to April 30, 2021, which may be exercised at any time prior to the then-existing Maturity Date by written notice thereof to the Company; provided that the Company has completed and filed at least one-half (½) of the SEC filings identified on Schedule 3(f) to the Agreement or the Company has substantially completed at least three-fourths (¾) of the SEC filings identified on Schedule 3(f) to the Agreement.

Now, if April 30th passes and we don't see a file to extend beyond this a week or two afterwards, then we can discuss that. As of now, QMC is within the bounds of their agreement.

Why would Pasaca exit the deal - as stated on Crunchbase - if they just invested $15 million in QMC? That makes absolutely no sense! Unless of course I'm right, and the deal is dead...

3.): "Exits will only appear on a profile if the person or organization was an investor in a funding round of a company that went public (and has the IPO listed on their company profile).

To be more specific, an exit will appear on person profile if the person was an individual investor in a funding round. Partner investments made on an investment firm’s behalf will not appear as exits for the partner.

Additionally, exits will only appear on an organization profile (company or school) if the organization was an investor in a funding round."

Quantum is public already, which is why the exit occurred. My prior post's proves Pasaca deal is in effect.

Why didn't Innova mention QMC health ID in that last PR? Why didn't Steven mention Pasaca in his last PR? A deal this important for investors in QMC needs to be communicated about, but just like in the past, we're back in "stealth mode", without any more SEC filings after that 1 old 10K...

4.) Why does each and every PR need to reference it's partnership with other companies?

Answer: They Don't.

That is not indicative of a "dead deal". It is a business update with regards to it's company. Once a material event is made between both parties, a press release will come out. Ample information has been provided in past Press Releases made by Quantum, including developmental updates on the 10K.

"1 old 10K"

LOL, that was a month ago. Not exactly "old" when it comes to business updates.

(: