"In the interview Rik eludes to a point about the court case being a barrier to current fins."
Yes, he said that. He needed money for lawyers and let accounting slide.
Am I to believe that he doesn't have the money to pay for the auditor?? Do you think it's more or less than this board invested in shares? Really think about the point you are trying to make. He can swipe my credit card. It's really hard to screw up as bad as he is... which is why I think its intentional non-disclosure. And if its not intentional its at the very least negligent to shareholders. It's disrespectful and feels FRAUDULENT.
" In their pump posts about getting current that was never said."
Right again. Why would he. This is his new plan.
You are trying to defend Rik by saying it's his new plan since all the recent promises that he's late on??
"...there will be no management change, you are going to have to suspend this stock if you want to hurt me."
- Rik?
Where does that quote come from. I follow this daily and can't recall ever seeing that.
That's the nature of new things, isn't it? If they explained why their old tricks are new again I wouldn't be left to speculate.
I'm sure a link can be posted to confirm that quote.
"All of the posts and communication and videos were window dressing to bolster the court case, not to build shareholder value."
Well that didn't work. Shareholders value went up.
Depends on what part of the chart you're reading. Mine says down since failing on expectations of redemption.
I think he knows he's in a fight he can't win.
You're conceding Rik can't win?
It's a game. Figure out the rules and play by them. Otherwise you'll be radio-silent crying on the sidelines.
