InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,702.55
(
-0.19%
)
US TECH 100
19,297.60
(
0.00%
)
Dow Jones
42,063.36
(
0.09%
)
Brent Oil
73.77
(
-0.16%
)
Bitcoin
63,436.86
(
-0.29%
)
Post# of 147097
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

iron-eagle

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 40
Posts 1517
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 10/12/2019

iron-eagle

Re: toncatmad post# 114069

Sunday, 04/18/2021 4:44:39 PM

Sunday, April 18, 2021 4:44:39 PM

Post# of 147097
don't forget the part in the patent agreement that didn't limit the rights of the Petitioners (aka Bioamber) to the patents. But since LCYB is operating the plant (aka the sale of the operations of the Company); or managing it as Murray says; they had to be granted access to what was needed to operate the plant. Section 167 do some dd.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up