InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 2978
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/28/2014

Re: None

Saturday, 04/17/2021 7:53:26 PM

Saturday, April 17, 2021 7:53:26 PM

Post# of 46435
Tom ,by this time, has had valuation experts place a fair & reasonable rate value for each of the patents. What is negotiated within that range will be the $$$ value assigned to each patent. With that value established all calculations will be taken from that $$$ number.

$$$ value assigned/patent then / unit x number of units/year for each year + future royalties....no 3x in a settlement.

So is, Tom establishing a base for valuation of each patent? And if LL accepts the negotiated valuation & the court approves of the settlement...that I would think establish a court approved valuation
that could be applied to Activision.

Same with Microsoft that would make two court approved settlements (obviously since it was settled out of court)

Taking two settlements (now and acceptable standard) to apply in Casper’s court. If my above assumptions are correct/legal then that is what I consider a brilliant move. We have a strong case but if above is possible further strengthens the case and the possible award amt...not to mention 3x.


Caculation IP
DR Teece explains applying a method of valuation 1/2 way in text


THIS IS IMPORTANT: Transcript Feb hearing DR teece valuaion

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LFdugjOHT1seSowTGqMHb3LoceS3P-AE/view?usp=drivesdk

Read more about Dr. Teece and his publications and activities at the UC Berkeley website, his Berkeley Research Group profile, and his Google Scholar page.


https://egrove.olemiss.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1025&context=aicpa_guides

DR David Teece

https://haas.berkeley.edu/faculty/teece-david/